<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>In a Nutshell &#187; Chinatown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.altrealm.com/tag/chinatown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.altrealm.com</link>
	<description>The Life, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 14:17:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Ghost Writer&#8221;.  An Intelligent and Tactful Review.</title>
		<link>http://www.altrealm.com/english/films/2010-03-28/the-ghost-writer-an-intelligent-and-tactful-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.altrealm.com/english/films/2010-03-28/the-ghost-writer-an-intelligent-and-tactful-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Svetlana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["The Ghost Writer"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinatown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ewan McGregor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expansive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f-words]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film noir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film noir nouveau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illuminate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irritate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jokes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laconic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[masterwork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melodramatic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[references]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roman Polanski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tactful]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.altrealm.com/?p=1349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all, I offer you an official review and in the next post, I will share my own thoughts.
 
 
Source: http://www.cinematical.com/2010/02/27/review-the-ghost-writer/
 
 
Review: The Ghost Writer
by Dawn Taylor Feb 27th 2010 // 1:03PM
 
 
 
 Roman Polanski&#8217;s latest thriller, The Ghost Writer, is a fascinating mash-up of homages, cinematic in-jokes and self-references, the sort of film that tends to either [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I offer you an official review and in the next post, I will share my own thoughts.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<h1>Source: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/02/27/review-the-ghost-writer/">http://www.cinematical.com/2010/02/27/review-the-ghost-writer/</a></h1>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Review: <strong><em>The Ghost Writer</em></strong></p>
<p>by Dawn Taylor Feb 27th 2010 // 1:03PM</p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/02/27/review-the-ghost-writer/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1350" title="Ghost Writer" src="http://www.altrealm.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Ghost-Writer.jpg" alt="Ghost Writer" width="502" height="294" /></a> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> Roman Polanski&#8217;s latest thriller, <strong><em>The Ghost Writer</em></strong>, is a fascinating mash-up of homages, cinematic in-jokes and self-references, the sort of film that tends to either delight or irritate film buffs &#8212; sometimes inspiring both reactions silmutaneously &#8212; while leaving more casual viewers a bit flummoxed. Surely Polanski couldn&#8217;t have meant for his green-screen backgrounds to be so patently false! And oh, the performances are stiff and self-conscious! Almost immediately, the arguments begin in one&#8217;s own head as to whether this movie is deliberately, stylishly melodramatic, or a tad clunky by accident.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As good as <strong><em>The Ghost Writer</em></strong> is &#8212; and it really is quite good &#8212; the film itself doesn&#8217;t seem to know, either. Part of the problem may lie in the road it took to the screen, what with the director finishing the film while under house arrest in Switzerland, and additional studio meddling which resulted in a painful number of overdubbed line-readings turning effing F-words into &#8220;soddings&#8221; and &#8220;buggers&#8221; in order to acquire a PG-13 rating. What&#8217;s left is the feeling that this could have been one of the director&#8217;s great films, in the same league as Chinatown or Knife in the Water, but the distractions of Polanski&#8217;s personal life, and other forces behind the scenes, kept it from reaching masterwork status.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The plot, adapted from Robert Harris&#8217; novel The Ghost, is a clever bit of nouveau noir: A professional ghostwriter (Ewan McGregor) is offered a truckload of money to complete the memoir of former British prime minister Adam Lang (Pierce Brosnan) after the original ghost dies under suspicious circumstances. Isolated at Lang&#8217;s coldly modern beach house and warned by Lang&#8217;s assistant (Kim Cattrall) that the manuscript must be kept under lock and key, the ghost slowly pieces together a puzzle that connects the memoir, Lang&#8217;s involvement in a CIA torture scandal, and his predecessor&#8217;s death. McGregor&#8217;s wide-eyed, &#8220;who me?&#8221; demeanor brings the right note of dewy dimness to the role, playing as he is a man who should have heard klaxon horns as soon as he was offered $250,000 for a month&#8217;s work.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The heaviest handed of Polanski&#8217;s homages comes with the way he fashions his picture as a modern-day Hitchcock film, with Cattrall standing in for Hitch&#8217;s signature icy blonde (and doing a fine job, despite an accent that veers wildly from upper-crust British to mid-Atlantic and back again) while Olivia Williams, as Lang&#8217;s wife, fills out the darker side of the neurotic-noir-gal quotient. A propulsive, orchestral score by Alexandre Desplat evokes Bernard Herrmann&#8217;s music for North by Northwest without being nearly as memorable. Polanski is at his Hitchcockiest in scenes that involve driving (a long set piece that has McGregor following the directions on a car&#8217;s GPS recalls James Stewart tailing Kim Novak in Vertigo) and an almost-final sequence that follows a note, passed hand-to-hand through a party, that goes on for about six hands further than it should.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong><em>The Ghost Writer</em></strong> also suffers a bit from overall tone, in that Polanski&#8217;s best films have had an intimate, close-in, almost claustrophobic quality to them, while here the action takes place in a glass-and-concrete mansion and outdoors on windswept winter beaches. All this chilly expanse is intended to create a sense of isolation, but unfortunately it also fails to draw us into McGregor&#8217;s increasing peril, as does Polanski&#8217;s insistence on presenting a couple of key plot turns via characters watching the news on enormous plasma-screen televisions &#8212; it keeps us at a distance, where the Hitchcock films on which Polanski is obviously basing this picture all become tighter framed, more entangled and tense as the story gallops toward conclusion. Despite a lot of wonderful imagery and a smart screenplay, the film is just too visually expansive and laconic to inspire an overwhelming sense of dread.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting to note that one of the better references in <strong><em>The Ghost Writer</em></strong> is to Polanski&#8217;s own work. As McGregor&#8217;s writer unravels the unsavory facts about his new job and his employer, we return two or three times to shots of Lang&#8217;s groundsman, a middle-aged Asian man, attempting to sweep off the deck outdoors next the beach. The wind whipping around him, he keeps adding detritus to a wheelbarrow only to have the wind blow it all back out onto the deck again. It&#8217;s a clever visual metaphor, and also recalls the Japanese gardener in Chinatown, who provided a key clue when he told Jake Gittes that his employer&#8217;s salt-water pond was &#8220;bad for glass.&#8221;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Almost any film by a master director offers moments that delight and illuminate, even when the movies themselves are minor offerings in the director&#8217;s oeuvre (see as well: Scorsese&#8217;s Shutter Island). The pace of <strong><em>The Ghost Writer</em></strong> is deliberate and assured; the performances by the actors are wisely considered. It&#8217;s a good-looking film that feels as if it could have used a bit of tightening up, as well as an R rating to avoid the unfortunate overdubbings &#8212; but there are moments of brilliance that make it more than worth tolerating the missteps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.altrealm.com/english/films/2010-03-28/the-ghost-writer-an-intelligent-and-tactful-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinatown as a &#8220;film noir&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.altrealm.com/english/films/2008-08-31/chinatown-as-a-film-noir/</link>
		<comments>http://www.altrealm.com/english/films/2008-08-31/chinatown-as-a-film-noir/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Svetlana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinatown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entrapment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film noir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Nicholson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roman Polanski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.altrealm.com/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The film &#8220;Chinatown&#8221; is a &#8220;film noir&#8221; because its subject matter revolves about fatality and futility of will, and this theme is supported by very effective visual techniques. No matter how hard the charactres try, they are powerless to overcome the obstacltes and unwritten rules. The main character, Jake Gittes, tries to protect his reputation, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The film &#8220;Chinatown&#8221; is a &#8220;film noir&#8221; because its subject matter revolves about fatality and futility of will, and this theme is supported by very effective visual techniques. No matter how hard the charactres try, they are powerless to overcome the obstacltes and unwritten rules. The main character, Jake Gittes, tries to protect his reputation, to do the right thing, and to protect an innocent and decent woman for whom we can assume he has affection, and he fails. The Chief Engineer of &#8220;Water and Power&#8221; tries to investigate and prevent a fraud and he is killed. Evelyn Mulwray tries to protect her daughter from the malicious father who forced Evelyn for incest. Evelyn dies and the daughter falls into the hands of the father and we can only guess what will happen to her, but the tone of the film leaves us very little optimism.</p>
<p>In my opinion, the film &#8220;Chinatown&#8221; is very well done visually to support the &#8220;noir&#8221; outlook. Roman Polanski used the colour contrasts very skillfully: the sunny streets of Los Angeles are contrasted with dim lit indoors (Chief Engineer&#8217;s office, the Hall of Records, the Cafe where Jake and Evelyn meet, the house where Katherine is almost imprisoned). Even the plot supports the shadows premise; Jake is a private investigator and he is lurking in the figurative shadows of the dark environment of human nature. Characters are very exquisite in their dressing styles, especially the main ones: Jake Gittes and Evelyn, as if for manifestation of their sef-consciousness and fragility. I found that the decision to cut Jack&#8217;s nostril almost at the beginning of the film and let him go through the film with a bandage on his nose was particularly effective. I think it is a great metaphor, &#8220;nosy fellows lose their noses&#8221;. The nose is the central part on the face and it is very obtrusive; we are constantly reminded of Jake&#8217;s predicament, as well as his determination to pursue his goal. In addition, it instills the sense of danger for the whole film.</p>
<p>The motive of entrapment is present in most of the scenes. We can see it in the beginning of the film when Jake started his investigation; he sat in the car and tried to be unnoticed by Hollis Mulwray. The investigation process suggests that we trying to see something and it is never clear, there is always something blocking the view: car interior, trees, other people etc. I found the scene when Jake first came to Mulwray&#8217;s mansion and stood in front of the closed door so closely that he could probably touch it by his nose, particularly effective, as if the character was imprisoned and blocked by something insurmountable. The motifs of Orange Orchids valleys, the aisles of the Hall of Records, the Water Works canals also support the theme of entrapment; their repetition throughout the film only enforces the impression.</p>
<p>In conclusion, I would like to emphasize that the film &#8220;Chinatown&#8221; belongs to the &#8220;film noir&#8221; genre by both its subject matter and visual techniques. It was done so skillfully and thoughtfully that I simply believe that it is a masterpiece in both &#8220;film noir&#8221; genre and the whole history of cinema.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.altrealm.com/english/films/2008-08-31/chinatown-as-a-film-noir/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

