<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>In a Nutshell &#187; sexuality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.altrealm.com/tag/sexuality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.altrealm.com</link>
	<description>The Life, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 01:59:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Quotes of the Day. January 26, 2010.</title>
		<link>http://www.altrealm.com/english/qoutes/2010-01-26/quotes-of-the-day-january-26-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.altrealm.com/english/qoutes/2010-01-26/quotes-of-the-day-january-26-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Svetlana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disappearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emptiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exactitude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hallucinations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indifference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Baudrillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voyeurism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.altrealm.com/?p=1099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
 
 
“Pornography is the quadraphonics of sex. It adds a third and fourth track to the sexual act. It is the hallucination of detail that rules. Science has already habituated us to this microscopics, this excess of the real in its microscopic detail, this voyeurism of exactitude.” (Jean Baudrillard)
 
“At the heart of pornography is sexuality haunted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote><p>“Pornography is the quadraphonics of sex. It adds a third and fourth track to the sexual act. It is the hallucination of detail that rules. Science has already habituated us to this microscopics, this excess of the real in its microscopic detail, this voyeurism of exactitude.” (Jean Baudrillard)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>“At the heart of pornography is sexuality haunted by its own disappearance” (Jean Baudrillard)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>“Sex is full of lies. The body tries to tell the truth. But, it&#8217;s usually too battered with rules to be heard, and bound with pretenses so it can hardly move. We cripple ourselves with lies.”  (Jim Morrison)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>“Smile and others will smile back. Smile to show how transparent, how candid you are. Smile if you have nothing to say. Most of all, do not hide the fact you have nothing to say nor your total indifference to others. Let this emptiness, this profound indifference shine out spontaneously in your smile.” (Jean Baudrillard)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.altrealm.com/english/qoutes/2010-01-26/quotes-of-the-day-january-26-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Victor Pelevin. Beauty and the Beast.</title>
		<link>http://www.altrealm.com/english/literature/2009-11-19/victor-pelevin-beauty-and-the-beast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.altrealm.com/english/literature/2009-11-19/victor-pelevin-beauty-and-the-beast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Svetlana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["The Sacred Book of Werewolf"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amphetamines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barbiturates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beauty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cocaine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meaning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metaphor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sigmund Freud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victor Pelevin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.altrealm.com/?p=965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
 
Victor Pelevin “The Sacred Book of Werewolf”
 
‘… Did Mikhalich give you the flower?’
 
‘Yes,’ I answered.  ‘And he told me I should think about the meaning of the message.  But I haven’t come up with anything.  Maybe you can tell me yourself?’
 
He scratched his head.  He seemed disconcerted by my question.
 
‘Do you know the folktale about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<h3>Victor Pelevin “The Sacred Book of Werewolf”</h3>
<p> </p>
<p>‘… Did Mikhalich give you the flower?’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘Yes,’ I answered.  ‘And he told me I should think about the meaning of the message.  But I haven’t come up with anything.  Maybe you can tell me yourself?’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>He scratched his head.  He seemed disconcerted by my question.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘Do you know the folktale about the little scarlet flower?’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘Which one exactly?’ I asked.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘I think there is only one.’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>He nodded towards a desk with a computer and a silver figurine standing on it.  There was a book lying beside the figurine, with bookmarks in several pages.  The half-effaced red letters of the title on its cover read: <em>Russian Fairy Tales.</em></p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘The story was written down by Sergei Aksakov,’ he said.  ‘His housekeeper Pelagia told him it.’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘And what about it?’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘About a beautiful girl and a beast.’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘And what’s the little flower got to do with it?’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘It was the reason everything began.  Do you really not know this fairy tale?’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘No.’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘It’s long, but the gist is this: a beautiful girl asked her father to bring her a scarlet flower.  The father found one in a magical garden a long way away and picked it.  But the garden was guarded by a terrible monster.  He caught the beautiful girl’s father, and she had to become the monster’s prisoner so that he would release her father.  The monster was ugly, but kind.  She fell in love with him, first for his kindness, and then simply in love.  And when they kissed, the spell was broken and the monster turned into a prince.’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘Aha,’ I said.  ‘Do you have any idea what it’s about?’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘Of course.’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘Yes? What is it about?’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘About love conquering all.’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I laughed.  He really was quite amusing.  He’d probably bumped off a few heavy hoods and ordered a hit on some banker, so now, with typical human presumption, he thought he was a monster.  And he also thought that love would save him.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>He took me by the arm and led me across to a futuristic divan standing between two groves of dwarf bonsais with miniature arbours, bridges and even waterfalls.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘Why are you laughing?’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘I can explain,’ I said, sitting down on the divan and pulling my legs up under me.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘Okay, explain.’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>He sat at the other end of the divan and crossed his legs.  I noticed the edge of a holster peeping out from under his uniform jacket.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘It’s one of those folktales that express the horror and pain of a woman’s first sexual experience,’ I said.  ‘There are lots of stories like that, and the one you just told me is a classic example.  It’s a metaphor of how a woman discovers the essentially bestial nature of man and becomes aware of her own power over that beast.  And the little scarlet flower that her father picks is such a literal symbol of defloration, amplified by the theme of incest, that I find it hard to believe the story was told by a housekeeper.  It was probably composed by some twentieth-century Viennese postgraduate to illustrate his thesis.  He invented the story, and the housekeeper Pelagia, and the writer Aksakov.’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>While I was talking, his expression turned noticeably gloomier.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘Where did you pick this stuff?’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘It’s all truisms.  Everybody knows it.’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘And you believe it?’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘What?’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘That this fairy tale is not about how love conquers everything on earth, but how defecation realizes its power over incest?’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘Defloration,’ I corrected him.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘It does not matter.  Is that what you really think?’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I thought about it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘I…. I don’t think anything.  That’s simply the contemporary discourse of folktales.’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘So you’re saying that because of this discourse, when someone gives you a scarlet flower you think it’s a symbol of defecation and incest?’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘No, don’t be like that,’ I replied, a little embarrassed.  ‘When someone gives me a scarlet flower I….I’m simply pleased.’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘Thank God,’ he said.  ‘And as for contemporary discourse, it’s high time to take an aspen stake and stuff it back up the cocaine-and-amphetamine polluted backside that produced it.’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I hadn’t expected such a sweeping generalization.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘Why?’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘So it won’t defile out little scarlet flower.’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘All right,’ I said, ‘I understand about the cocaine.  You mean Dr Freud.  He did have that little peccadillo.  But what have amphetamines got to do with it?’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘I can explain,’ he said.  And tucked his legs up underneath himself in a parody of my pose.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘Okay, explain.’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘All those French parrots who invented discourse were high on amphetamines all the time.  In the evening they take barbiturates to get to sleep, and they start off the morning with amphetamines so they can generate as much discourse as possible before they start taking barbiturates to get back to sleep again.  That’s all there is to discourse.  Didn’t you know that?’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘Where did you get information like that?’</p>
<p> </p>
<p>‘There was a course at the FSB Academy about modern psychedelic culture.  Counter-brainwashing.  Oh yes, I forgot to say – they’re all queers too.  In case you were going to ask what the backside had to do with anything.’</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.altrealm.com/english/literature/2009-11-19/victor-pelevin-beauty-and-the-beast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Piano Teacher (La Pianiste)&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.altrealm.com/english/films/2009-07-18/the-piano-teacher-la-pianiste/</link>
		<comments>http://www.altrealm.com/english/films/2009-07-18/the-piano-teacher-la-pianiste/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Svetlana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.altrealm.com/?p=185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


It&#8217;s not as horrible as it might seem &#8211; Svetlana

 


I watched this film twice and I can watch it again and again. There was a time for me when I could not stand the phrase &#8220;Not everyone&#8217;s movies&#8221;. It made me feel inferior, lacking intelligence or an eye for art. Then I decided I do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table id="Reviews_rptReviews_ctl02_tblReviewSummary" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width: 300px;" height="20" valign="top"><strong>It&#8217;s not as horrible as it might seem</strong> &#8211; <a id="Reviews_rptReviews_ctl02_hlReviewerID" href="http://www.altrealm.com/community/viewProfile.aspx?profileid=18212">Svetlana</a><br />
<img style="width: 13px; height: 16px; border-width: 0px;" src="http://images.zip.ca/zip/rating/rating_blue_full.gif" alt="" align="absMiddle" /><img style="width: 13px; height: 16px; border-width: 0px;" src="http://images.zip.ca/zip/rating/rating_blue_full.gif" alt="" align="absMiddle" /><img style="width: 13px; height: 16px; border-width: 0px;" src="http://images.zip.ca/zip/rating/rating_blue_full.gif" alt="" align="absMiddle" /><img style="width: 13px; height: 16px; border-width: 0px;" src="http://images.zip.ca/zip/rating/rating_blue_full.gif" alt="" align="absMiddle" /><img style="width: 13px; height: 16px; border-width: 0px;" src="http://images.zip.ca/zip/rating/rating_blue_full.gif" alt="" align="absMiddle" /></td>
<td style="width: 65px;" align="right" valign="top"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" valign="top"><span id="Reviews_rptReviews_ctl02_lblReviewText">I watched this film twice and I can watch it again and again. There was a time for me when I could not stand the phrase &#8220;Not everyone&#8217;s movies&#8221;. It made me feel inferior, lacking intelligence or an eye for art. Then I decided I do not have to feel that way and I have not ever since. I simply came up with my own system of rating films. First thing that I decide (usually upon completing watching a movie), do I like it or not? Then I try to figure out why. Then I always ask myself, whether I would watch it again. That is the best part. If I can stand the idea of watching the film again, then it must be good. I think this film should be watched, if only to make people think. I did think a lot about &#8220;The Piano Teacher&#8221; and heroine. And my conclusion is that what happened at the end of the film is a good thing for her, she did suffer in her life but she could not break free. I liken it to joint displacement &#8211; it hurts, but to put it back and get rid of the pain it requires more acute pain. I think everyone can watch this film and it will be especially good for people who refuse to think, because &#8220;The Piano Teacher&#8221; has the power to awaken people from slumber and repeating ready opinions.</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.altrealm.com/english/films/2009-07-18/the-piano-teacher-la-pianiste/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
